ProClim introduces the latest scientific findings regarding climate change to political and public discussion. The forum provides a network for the scientific and political communities and society as a whole, thus contributing to a climate-neutral and climate-resilient Switzerland.more

Image: NASAmore

Meeting Report 25th Swiss Global Change Day

Lint Barrage talking about the fiscal consequences of climate change at the 25th Swiss Global Change Day
Lint Barrage talking about the fiscal consequences of climate change at the 25th Swiss Global Change DayImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Lint Barrage talking about the fiscal consequences of climate change at the 25th Swiss Global Change Day
Lint Barrage talking about the fiscal consequences of climate change at the 25th Swiss Global Change DayImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT

This was the 25th Swiss Global Change Day

Is the AMOC really slowing down? Does it have a tipping point? And if yes, what are the consequences for weather extremes in Europe? Based on his latest research insights of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), Stefan Rahmstorf from Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) started off the Swiss Global Change Day with a warning: Even though it is still unclear how close the AMOC tipping point is, it is certainly too close for comfort and reaching it should be avoided at all costs.

Stefan Rahmstorf presenting the latest insights of his AMOC research
Stefan Rahmstorf presenting the latest insights of his AMOC researchImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Stefan Rahmstorf presenting the latest insights of his AMOC research
Stefan Rahmstorf presenting the latest insights of his AMOC researchImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
  • The AMOC is weakening, which is causing the cold blob to be lower in salinity
    • Short to mid term: Europe becomes a heat wave hotspot (incidence four times larger than globally)
    • Longer term: The cold blob will expand
    • The AMOC slowdown will also increase the intensity of winter storms in Europe
    • IPCC models might underestimate the cold blob problem because the AMOC is modeled too stable
  • The AMOC has a tipping point, which is a point where a single change becomes self-reinforcing. At this point, the AMOC shifts into a qualitatively different state
    • It is still uncertain how close this tipping point is. Recent studies suggest that it is maybe too close for comfort and much closer than was assumed a few years ago.

This wake up call was followed by a talk by ETH Professor Lint Barrage. She compared the economic and human health consequences of tropical cyclones in Australia and Mozambique to illustrate the fiscal consequences of climate change. She emphasized that we currently understand very little about the link between climate change and public finance. Professor Barrage identified four main channels through which climate change and related extreme events affect public finances:

  1. Increased public spending pressures,
  2. New investment requirements,
  3. Revenue shortfalls, and
  4. Higher public borrowing costs.

She warned that this dynamic can create a fiscal poverty trap for nations in the Global South. After a disaster, available capital diminishes, while default risks and borrowing costs rise. This in turn further reduces access to capital, reinforcing a vicious cycle.

Lint Barrage during her keynote «Unseen and Unprepared: The Fiscal Toll of Climate Change»
Lint Barrage during her keynote «Unseen and Unprepared: The Fiscal Toll of Climate Change»Image: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Lint Barrage during her keynote «Unseen and Unprepared: The Fiscal Toll of Climate Change»
Lint Barrage during her keynote «Unseen and Unprepared: The Fiscal Toll of Climate Change»Image: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
  • Climate–fiscal interactions are a first-order concern for societal resilience, economic damages, and public budgets
  • Yet they remain severely understudied—standard models miss key fiscal-climate feedbacks
  • There is an opportunity to develop adaptive fiscal and financial tools that mitigate climate costs
  • A risk of vicious cycles exists as climate shocks hit budgets precisely when spending flexibility is needed
  • Inter- and cross-disciplinary work is essential
  • Emerging fiscal impacts literature is strongly reliant on advances in natural sciences
  • Important impacts are still under-counted (e.g., health costs from wildfire smoke) due to modeling gaps (Qiu et al. 2024)

We moved over from the fiscal to the legal space to discuss the case of the Senior Women for Climate Protection – exactly one year after the historical ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). After giving us a short overview of the case, Charlotte Blattner was joined on stage by Ana Vicedo-Cabrera and Sonia Seneviratne. Approaching the topic from different backgrounds, the three researchers had all participated in Third Party Interventions concerning this specific case. They debunked some of the myths around the ruling and gave us their assessment of what happened so far since the ruling and what is going to happen next.

«Climate litigation is not just a trend, it will stay and get more relevant going forward as well, especially also in topics of adaptation and loss and damages» – Charlotte Blattner

Sonia Seneviratne, Ana M. Vicedo-Cabrera and Charlotte Blattner discussing the case of the Senior Women for Climate Protection with Nicola Forster
Sonia Seneviratne, Ana M. Vicedo-Cabrera and Charlotte Blattner discussing the case of the Senior Women for Climate Protection with Nicola ForsterImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Sonia Seneviratne, Ana M. Vicedo-Cabrera and Charlotte Blattner discussing the case of the Senior Women for Climate Protection with Nicola Forster
Sonia Seneviratne, Ana M. Vicedo-Cabrera and Charlotte Blattner discussing the case of the Senior Women for Climate Protection with Nicola ForsterImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT

What happened?

  • In 2016, five individuals requested the Swiss government to do something about climate change; this was the start of KlimaSeniorinnen and others v. Switzerland. KlimaSeniorinnen, argued that the government's insufficient climate policies endangered their health and well-being, particularly during heatwaves.

  • They exhausted all domestic remedies and the case was moved along to the ECtHR.

  • On 9 April, 2024 the ruling of ECtHR was announced. This was historical because it was the first ruling of the ECtHR in this matter.

    • The ECtHR found that Switzerland violated the European Convention on Human Rights because it violates the human rights of older women by failing to adequately protect them from the effects of climate change.

    • The ECtHR ruling requires Switzerland to base its climate targets on a carbon budget. This means that Switzerland must clearly define how much greenhouse gas emissions it will allow itself and how it will ensure compliance with international climate goals.

What happened since then? What happens next?

  • The case was controversially discussed in media and led to different reactions from politicians, NGOs and other actors.
  • The upper and lower chamber of Swiss Parliament accused ECtHR of inapproriate and inadmissible activism.
  • The Federal Council stated that the Switzerland is doing enough already to protect its citizens from climate change.
  • In October 20204, the Federal Council published an Action Report in response of the judgement.
  • In early march 2025, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, the body that oversees the implementation of ECtHR rulings, noted that more action is needed in particular on the mitigation side by the Swiss government.
  • In September 2025 the Committee of Ministers will once again assess the case.
Alexandre Cellier and his son provide musical entertainment at the 25th Swiss Global Change Day
Alexandre Cellier and his son provide musical entertainment at the 25th Swiss Global Change DayImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Alexandre Cellier and his son provide musical entertainment at the 25th Swiss Global Change Day
Alexandre Cellier and his son provide musical entertainment at the 25th Swiss Global Change DayImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT

After lunch and a delightful surprise musical input, Niklaus Zimmermann (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Federal Institute of Technology Zurich ETHZ) gave a keynote on the co-benefits of finding joint solutions for biodiversity conservation and climate change protection. He emphasized the importance of compromise and the need for strategic optimization at the national level to ensure connectivity between different habitats and species. This becomes especially important when we consider that with climate change, species start migrating and need to be able to cross over from one habitat to another.

Niklaus Zimmermann and Chair Anthony Patt during the Q&A of Zimmermann's keynote
Niklaus Zimmermann and Chair Anthony Patt during the Q&A of Zimmermann's keynoteImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Niklaus Zimmermann and Chair Anthony Patt during the Q&A of Zimmermann's keynote
Niklaus Zimmermann and Chair Anthony Patt during the Q&A of Zimmermann's keynoteImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
  • Compromises are needed, but are efficient if elaborated jointly (climate, biodiversity, agriculture, recreation).
  • Strategies/optimizations should be formulated nationally.
  • Biodiversity protection is lagging behind in Switzerland (insufficient area, no design; lack of connectivity and complementarity)
  • Synergies and co-benefits exist but require partners to collaborate with creativity and positive attitude!

The Poster Awards winners were announced after another coffee break. In the «Geosphere | Biosphere» category, Helene Hollitzer impressed the judges with her research on Arctic Ocean acidification, demonstrating how terrigenous carbon and nutrient inputs affect both annual mean and seasonal variability. The «Atmosphere | Hydrosphere» category saw two winners this year: Onno Doensen used the Weather Research & Forecasting Model to examine Mediterranean cyclones in detail. He revealed that while they’ll become less frequent in the years to come, we can expect them to be significantly more extreme. And Francesco Grossi’s project looked at carbon and water cycles in plants. He demonstrated that vegetation activity can be accurately represented at global scale with a simple model – a critical tool as we face mounting climate challenges. Last but not least, Elisabeth Tadiri captured the «Human Dimensions | Sustainability» award by examining how extreme humid heat impacts human health. She studied vulnerable populations living in the town of Basse Santa Su in The Gambia.

  • Helene Hollitzer won the Poster Award in the category «Geosphere | Biosphere» category
  • Two winners in the category «Atmosphere | Hydrosphere»: Onno Doensen and Francesco Grossi
  • Elisabeth Tadiri received the «Human Dimensions | Sustainability» award
  • Helene Hollitzer won the Poster Award in the category «Geosphere | Biosphere» categoryImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT1/3
  • Two winners in the category «Atmosphere | Hydrosphere»: Onno Doensen and Francesco GrossiImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT2/3
  • Elisabeth Tadiri received the «Human Dimensions | Sustainability» awardImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT3/3
  • Helene Hollitzer won the Poster Award in the category «Geosphere | Biosphere» category
  • Two winners in the category «Atmosphere | Hydrosphere»: Onno Doensen and Francesco Grossi
  • Elisabeth Tadiri received the «Human Dimensions | Sustainability» award
Helene Hollitzer won the Poster Award in the category «Geosphere | Biosphere» categoryImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT1/3

The last keynote of the day outlined the challenges for companiees to communicate their Net Zero goals. Nadine Strauss, communication scientist from University of Zurich, gave us an insight into her research on why companies set themselves Net Zero goals in the first place, why they are sometimes hesitant to communicate them and how these challenges can be overcome through alignment, open and transparent communication, organizational listening and dialogic relationships.

Nadine Strauss talking about the challenges for companies to communicate their Net Zero goals
Nadine Strauss talking about the challenges for companies to communicate their Net Zero goalsImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
Nadine Strauss talking about the challenges for companies to communicate their Net Zero goals
Nadine Strauss talking about the challenges for companies to communicate their Net Zero goalsImage: Andres Jordi, SCNAT
  • Reaching net-zero targets remains a huge challenge for corporations.
  • Corporations and the media shape net-zero discourses.
  • Corporations actively partake in this sense-giving and -making process and have a societal and environmental responsibility.
  • (Ethical) Strategic communication can accelerate the transformation and engage various stakeholders.

We rounded the day off with an aperitif in the sun-drenched foyer, where the climate community engaged in a lively exchange about posters, projects and current research - exactly what we want to promote with this event.